We’re still on the subject of doing many things at a time,
or over a lifetime, which we started with in the last post. Like I said, there
are a couple of books which address this very topic in detail. The first of
these is What Do I Do When I Want To Do
Everything? by Barbara Sher, sub-titled “A leading life coach’s guide to
creating a life you’ll love”. Barbara’s main plank is that people who like to
keep trying new things, never settling down to one vocation, much to the
frustration of their families and well-wishers, may be just made to be learners
throughout their lives. She calls them (us!) “Scanners” (I will use the word always
with a capital S, to give it a proper weight and dignity, like President or
Comptroller).
Apparently it is the process of taking up a subject or field
of activity and studying it deeply enough to be competent in it, that motivates
Scanners. I think I meant something like this in a previous post (#37 To find a
purpose) when I talked about making the process itself interesting so that one
is not too involved in the results. For Scanners tend to leave the subject when
once they have achieved a certain level of familiarity; they are not in the
game of doing the same thing over and over again as a job… sounds familiar!
Sher has a detailed typology of Scanners: we can be Serial
Masters, who like to take up one thing at a time, master it, and then abandon
it; or Cyclical Scanners, who tend to circle back to older interests over a
period of years (my front burner - back burner idea makes me this type, I
guess). Others are Samplers, who like to try a number (dozens) of things,
without going too deep into many of them. Whatever type you are, Sher’s message
is that it’s alright to be like that, even if you don’t get to leave behind a
legacy in any of them.
One of the most useful (if that can be said of any Scanner
activity!) is the idea of keeping a Scanner Daybook, to record all your
fleeting inspirations and ideas every day by the hour. The way the author
describes it, it is meant to be a sufficiently heavy and impressive looking
tome, preferably well upholstered and fit to display on its own stand (like an
illuminated bible or domesday book or something!), with large unlined pages to
receive your thoughts, compositions, drawings, recipes, samples and
memorabilia, like da Vinci’s notebooks. I gather that the idea of the Daybook
is to use one pair of open pages for each idea or project that occurs to you,
and keep on opening new pages as each new idea strikes your mind. Over time, it
is supposed to end up as a complete store of all your ideas, even if you
haven’t acrtually worked through any or most of them. As you add detail or
achieve progress, I guess you are expected to fill in notes in the two-page
spread over the years.
I have to confess that this may be a bit beyond my
persistance and work habits, although the idea sounds good. I have so far used
a series of discarded diaries for my note taking, using separate ones for my
work-work activities (mainly the light-weight, flexible, spiral-bound notebooks
they hand out in seminars and training courses), which last up to a month each,
and a separate series for my project ideas, for which I use the out-of-date
hard-bound diaries that accumulate all the time (of course, they have all sorts
of other matter printed on each page!). These latter are my version of the
Scanner Daybooks, but far from looking like a beautiful souvenir, they are full
of dense scribbling that I myself sometimees
find it difficult to decipher!
I have seen two examples of the beautiful life-time records
that Sher is apparently thinking of. One is the field notebooks of the famous
Indian bird specialist (ornithologist), Salim Ali: he has recorded each day’s
notes in a beautiful handwriting, complete with drawings and other stuff. I
guess they are preserveed in the Bombay Natural History Society at Mumbai, but
I saw one sample kept under glass at the Sultanpur bird sanctuary near Delhi many years back. I
haven’t been able to locate any scanned images of his journals, but here’s one,
of his handwritten note at Rangantittoo bird sanctuary near Mysore , Karnataka.
The other example was the field diaries maintained by the
professor heading the Centre for Development Studies, Swansea ,
whose system was even more elaborate. He used to record his notes in two
copies (using pencils!) through a carbon paper, and then he’d tear away the
duplicates and sort and file them classified by topic, while the original would
be stored away obviously in order of date (year and month). So his study would
have these arrays of identical looking diaries, and the loose sheets would have
been filed away in their separate folders, subject-wise.
I never tried to emulate Salim Ali’s system (it was just too
perfect!), but I remember I did foolishly try the good professor’s, but I gave
it up after a few days and reverted to my shabby system of a running entry of
notes on everything (including the daily to-do list!) in a series of
mismatching notebooks and diaries. But at least I have all of them bundled
together somewhere! On occasion, I would type up important bits and print them
out for my files and folders on specific subjects. One suggetion that I have
always used is to collect information on specific topics in big ‘ring-files’ … an essential for any type of research. I also
have this thing about collecting newspaper cuttings (which gives you the uncanny
ability to pull out quotes and allusions from years back!). The accompanying
picture shows how easy it is to get behind in this department!
I tried to work Sher’s Daybook system before writing this
piece – I even dug out a nice artsy-looking old empty diary for the purpose –
but I find that this two-page spread per idea is just too tedious (for me!). So
my Scanner Daybook has degenerated as before into a diary where I can go on
jotting down ideas as they come, and mentally slotting each into its relevant project
slot (one longs for an automated categorizer like Lotus Agenda, a PIM which I
have described in my www.doingtheDewey blog). Then as I get to doing whatever needs to be done in
respect of each item, I can make a note of this ‘action taken’ and cross it
off. Indeed, I find now that this is very similar to the diary I maintain for
my financial activities (investments, major purchases) – while it would be
great to have each item classified under different heads (fixed deposits,
provident funds, savings certificates, furniture purchases, equipment,
vehicles, and so on), what I have learnt is that it is crucial to just make a
single serially numbered entry in the ‘daily’ book, with the date, value, and
date of maturity and expected value wherever appropriate. Then I just have to
scan the list once in a while to tend my garden (or attic) of possessions. As I
convert one thing into another, or throw it away, I cross it off and enter a
reference number for the new thing(s). I am now down (or up!) to the 500’s,
that many transactions having been
recorded over the years!
So the Scanner Daybook in my case is nothing but a daily
Ideas-book. I don’t exactly monitor my ‘projects’ here, but in case some
activity develops further, I use another notebook to record notes, ideas, etc.
regarding that subject. So Music, for example, has its own notebooks,
Photography likewise. But my ‘daybook’ has a jumble of everything. One day I
hope to cross off everything in the older volumes, but till then I realize I
have a ‘Scrabbler’ rather than a ‘Scanner’ daybook!
Another idea that I
really like is to set off specific areas of the house for specific activities
or projects. I think this is more practical than organizing a single daybook
for all projects together. It’s like each hobby has its own corner, like you would have separate sub-directories on a computer, or in real life a books corner (or
room!), a carpentry corner (in the garage), and a garden shed (or box). Sher
suggests making a Life’s Work Bookshelf to display the results of whatever
you’ve done or collected in each field over the years, even if it doesn’t amount
to anything earth-shattering.
Finally, of course, you do need to have some source of
income to support all this happy hunting. The ideal thing, of course, is that
you get paid to do what you love (become a paid travel writer or
resort-reviewer, for instance!), but if it ends up looking too much like work,
you may rebel! So there is the compromise of a ‘good enough’ job to keep you
going. In my case, I was lucky to ‘stumble upon’ a profession that has a lot of
in-built variety (the forest service), so I think I had no qualms about sticking
to it for 38 years in a most un-Scanner manner, while I developed various
interests on the side!
I’ll describe the other book, by Lobenstine, next post.
Books cited
Lobenstine, Margaret. 2006. The Renaissance Soul. Life Design for People with Too Many Passions to
Pick Just One. Broadway Books, New
York .
Sher, Barbara. 2006. What
Do I Do When I Want To Do Everything? A Leading Life Coach’s Guide to Creating
a Life You’ll Love. Rodale International Ltd., London .
