Margaret Lobenstein
describes the multi-interest character as The
Renaissance Soul; such persons tend to get excited by many things at a
time, but find it difficult to choose; love new challenges but once these are
mastered, get easily bored; take up many hobbies briefly; feel trapped and
restless even in successful jobs. They want variety and fresh challenges all
the time! In her 2006 book, this
pioneering inn-keeper turned life and career coach has many suggestions to get
such a life while still making ends meet.
The essence of Margaret’s
advice is expressed in these three points: firstly, get focus, so that you are
able to get into action; secondly, get money by “linking your passions to a
source of income”; and how to organize your time to match your “Renaissance
soul rhythms”. Regarding the second (income), she suggests many options to
finance your wanderings and love of variety: pursue different careers,
sequentially; or get an “umbrella” job that “embraces many interests”; get two
jobs rather than one; get a J-O-B that “serves one’s interests”; or even a
“single career path” that allows you to
accommodate many interests. I think I got lucky with the last alternative, as a
career in the forest service allowed me not only to indulge my love of nature and
travelling, but also gave me the time and the support to pursue higher studies,
occupy positions in different fields and levels in general administration,
teaching, research, policy direction, even the corporate world, apart from
developing other interests and hobbies on my own, like music and photography.
Plus, as I explained before, it gave me a good retirement scheme – enabling me
to satisfy both passion and pension!
An initial exercise
recommended by Margaret Lobenstein is to identify your five or
half a dozen core values that you
feel are most important to you now, from
a list of fifty or so. You could also match your life goals (from a list of ten
or so) to circles of different sizes to get a feel of their relative importance
to you. She also gives you the ‘obituary test’. Once you’ve done these self-discovery
exercises, you are supposed to find it easier to reorder your life to give more
space to your highest priority values and goals.
The book suggests that
one way to move out of the paralysis of choice, and achieve more of your
Renaissance soul goals, is to narrow down your priorities to four or so activities
at a particular period in your life, or to identify your focal points. This is an acknowledgment, of course, of the
limitations on every person’s time and resources. It will be impossible to do
all those fifteen activities you are fascinated by, all together, so the strategy
is to dwell at a time on a short list
of three to five (“When it comes to Focal Points, four seems to be a lucky
number for Renaissance souls”). This
would be akin to the Serial Master type of Scanner in the previous post
(Barbara Sher’s book): they get their variety, plus they are able to get on
with some activity instead of being eternally undecided and flitting from idea
to idea. As you get into each of these limited areas of interest, you may find
you’ve had enough of some of them, and can happily retire them in favour of
other, more interesting activities. Of course, if you do not want to abandon
them altogether, then you will have to keep them on the ‘back burner’ till you
are done with the other choices, and circle back to them at a later period of
your life like the cyclical Scanners of the last post.
An interesting part of
the book is the advice on how to bring the circle of passions and the source of
income closer together. Margaret calls this the J-O-B, spelling it out letter
by letter, as distinct from a routine soul-deadening
livelihood as in ‘don’t give up your day job’. One has to pick a J-O-B that in
some ways complements the focal points of one’s real interests and values.
These are the five possible benefits of a J-O-B: it could be a source of
income, a source of energy (not competing with the focal point passions!), a
time saver, a way of getting training or equipment, or a means of networking.
The J-O-B chosen should supply at least a couple of these benefits.
Personally, I am not
quite sure that a series of temporary positions will amount to a satisfactory
career in the long term, but I suppose the job situation is different now, as
many youngsters do want to build up their own outfits after a few years of
working for others. A variety of occupations and experiences may be
advantageous here. A lot of people are trying to combine a love of outdoors
with photography, conservation, or with a business like running a resort or a tour
outfit, or running nature camps for kids, for instance. It may be interesting
to do a little study of where they all end up: as publishers or film makers or restaurateurs
or directors of NGO concerns – or political activists? To give the author credit, she does advice
that even if the day job amounts to a long-term (full time) career, it should
be used to advantage to support the passions, by thinking of it as a J-O-B
rather than feeling handcuffed and frustrated by its demands on your time and
energy. I think I like this option, as it may save a lot of young people from
going astray in pursuit of moon dust! Another interesting and fruitful idea she
offers is to find an “umbrella” career position that can provide a legitimate
job title as well as a cover for your current focal points.
There’s lots more good
advice here, including suggestions for young people in choosing courses at
school and college. A point I really like is that you may be attracted to a
process of learning some occupation, but may not really be inclined to take it
up as a career: “sometimes success rests not in the product but in the
process”. She suggests the PRISM test of the current Focal Points to identify
your priority interests: the test of Price, Reality, Integrity, Specificity and
Measurability. This jargon should appeal to the management-oriented types
amongst the Renaissance souls (or Scanners, if you prefer).
Most of us have
probably experienced short periods of intense immersion in some project or
activity under the pressure of some deadline or obligation, when things seemed
to come together of their own and our inner system seemed to be humming along
powerfully in synch with events in the outer world. The author Robert Greene in
his book Mastery describes the
experience of focus this way: “Instead of flitting here and there in a state of
perpetual distraction, our minds focus and penetrate to the core of something
real. At these moments it is as if our minds – turned outward – are now flooded
with light from the world around us, and suddenly exposed to new details and
ideas, we become more inspired and creative... Once the deadline has passed or
the crisis is over, this feeling of power and heightened creativity generally
fades away. We return to our distracted state and the sense of control is gone.
If only we could manufacture this feeling, or somehow keep it alive longer… but
it seems so mysterious and elusive.”
And yes, Margaret does
have a Focal Points workbook to maintain, with one section for each Focal Point
(and a miscellaneous appendix for all the rest!). Like I said in the last post,
this is my weak area, and I tend to just keep a very untidy daily cashbook sort
of diary with a running list of ideas and things to do, rather than formal work
charts or critical path charts (“working backwards from the goal”). I’m sure by
now that I will be neither opening resorts nor running NGOs, and I will be
amusing myself by myself in my own way - but perhaps you may be made of sterner
stuff!
Books cited
Greene, Robert. 2012. Mastery.
Profile Books Ltd., London .
Lobenstine, Margaret. 2006. The Renaissance Soul. Life Design for People with Too Many Passions to
Pick Just One. Broadway Books, New
York .
Sher, Barbara. 2006. What
Do I Do When I Want To Do Everything? A Leading Life Coach’s Guide to Creating
a Life You’ll Love. Rodale International Ltd., London .
Good read! Much of this is true. One needs diverse interests to enjoy life - even the Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution tells us that.
ReplyDelete